Champagne Socialists Are The New Bourgeoisie Of Today
Source: Squarespace/ Unsplash
Wealthy Liberals
The term champagne socialist has long been used as a sneer—a way to dismiss people who speak the language of equality while enjoying the perks of privilege. But in today’s world, where politics is often reduced to performance or tribalism, the so-called champagne socialists may be one of the last groups still attempting to bridge the gap between comfort and conscience.
They are not perfect. They may live in nice neighborhoods, dine at farm-to-table restaurants, and post about union drives from iPhones. But they also fund grassroots campaigns, elevate progressive causes, and use their platforms—earned or inherited—to shift the culture in more just directions. They are people who live well and still care, even when they don’t have to. That should be celebrated, not mocked.
Throughout history, every revolution has had allies from within the elite. The civil rights movement had white clergy and liberal donors. Labor rights were pushed forward not just by factory workers, but also by journalists, academics, and sympathetic lawmakers. Change often comes when the comfortable make themselves useful—not by pretending to be poor, but by putting resources to work.
Source: Squarespace/ Unsplash
The Value Of Wealth Is Subjective
In contrast to champagne socialists, many wealthy individuals in positions of power often prioritize personal gain over the well-being of their communities and long-term stability. With many of the planet’s resources being finite, it’s crucial for those with influence to recognize that accumulating wealth and resources without limit ultimately harms everyone—including themselves.
As communities are depleted and weakened, social cohesion erodes, and the very systems that support prosperity begin to falter. When communities deteriorate, the broader society risks becoming unstable and dysfunctional.
At a certain point, when a community deteriorates too rapidly, the very foundations that give value to wealth—especially paper currency—begin to erode. Money doesn’t exist in a vacuum; it derives its strength from the systems, institutions like the Federal Reserve, and people that surround it. If the local infrastructure breaks down, if education, public health, safety, and trust in governance collapse, then the currency tied to that system becomes less meaningful. Inflation can spiral, assets lose their utility, and even significant personal wealth may not insulate individuals from the chaos that follows.
In extreme cases, history has shown that when social fabric unravels, no amount of money can buy stability, security, or peace of mind. True value depends on a functioning society, and once that begins to collapse, the illusion of individual financial insulation quickly disappears.
Social Reform And Advocating For The Disenfranchised
Today’s champagne socialist isn’t an impostor; they’re an amplifier. They may have the means to insulate themselves from the worst parts of the system, but instead, many choose to critique it from within. They send donations, they attend city council meetings, they argue with uncles at Thanksgiving, and yes, they post. Mock the activism all you want—but for a generation raised on irony and disillusionment, the mere act of caring earnestly is a political statement.
And no, shopping at Ralph Lauren doesn’t negate your support for universal healthcare. Wearing Prada doesn’t cancel out your support for higher corporate taxes. Living well and advocating for a more equitable world is not hypocrisy—it’s modern, morally aware citizenship.
If the new bourgeoisie is waking up to its responsibility, that’s not cause for ridicule—it’s a cultural shift. Better an upper-middle-class progressive than a comfortable cynic. Because at the end of the day, it’s not what’s in your glass—it’s what you’re willing to pour back into the world.
